2 ms·
Yeah, this is where empathy comes in. You need to read the person/people. I should have been more clear, its more of a template, than a stock answer. Having a
by KaiserPro 3y ago
Yeah, this is where empathy comes in. You need to read the person/people.
I should have been more clear, its more of a template, than a stock answer. Having a cache of information is not the same as "not listening". You still need to listen and respond to the subject at hand.
For example, you are having a meeting about door handles. You know there is a problem about the placing, but also one person is keen on changing the material because they like brass more. However brass is more expensive, so the team needs to agree a threshold at which it becomes practical to change to brass.
Now, if you had fresh in your cache a list of reasons why brass might be useful, and why its not, you can be prepared to counter or boost "that one brass Guy"'s point of view.
You don't go in and say "brass is shit yo" the subject might not come up.
- jghn 3y ago> I should have been more clear, its more of a template, than a stock answer That and also there's no rule that says a person who is generating responses ahead of time has to stick to exactly one possibility. When preparing for conversations it's important to walk down multiple paths at multiple branch points. To the point you've been raising in this thread it is about being prepared to be sharp in a conversation, not to railroad the other person and/or come across like a politician on the Sunday AM talk shows.