3 ms·
OSI seem like a privately organized special interest group. What authority do they have to define the term “open source”?
by tobyjsullivan 3y ago
OSI seem like a privately organized special interest group.
What authority do they have to define the term “open source”?
- karolist 3y agoValid question. Why is this down voted?
- monocasa 3y agoTheir original board created the term in the 90s as an alternative to GNU's free software.
- tobyjsullivan 3y agoOh, thanks. OSI has been around much longer than I expected. This post[0] dives into who coined the term (spoiler: it predates OSI by a long, long time), but it’s reasonable that OSI popularized it alongside their specific definition. [0] https://lunduke.substack.com/p/who-really-coined-the-term-open-source https://lunduke.substack.com/p/who-really-coined-the-term-op... IMHO, to the extent that their goal was to find a less confusing term than “free”, I’d say they’ve failed.