3 ms·

Funny enough on my machine, Chrome is the slowest on https://browserbench.org/Speedometer2.1/ https://browserbench.org/Speedometer2.1/ 401 - Chrome 446 - Fire

• Meegul 3y ago
  357 - Chrome with extensions 511 - Chrome without any extensions 433 - Clean firefox install 500 - Clean edge install On an AMD Ryzen 7950X3D / 5600MHz RAM Interestingly, I got substantially different results depending on whether I used chrome with my typical extensions or not. Looking at the flamegraph, I don't seem to see the full picture of why there's such a substantial difference. Bitwarden/React Developer tools (the 2 primary extensions I use) don't seem to make enough of an impact to account for the roughly 40% performance increase seen without them. The browserbench javascript accounted for ~38.6% of the overall time taken for the benchmark, but the sum of my extensions was only 6.5%. I'm not incredibly familiar with browser performance profiling, so there's probably more to the story.
• nozzlegear 3y ago
  Neat site but it almost needs a flash/epilepsy warning =P
• tasuki 3y ago
  Isn't that pretty much irrelevant? Won't network speed etc make much more of a difference?
• brokencube 3y ago
  Probably subjective to your particular set up - I just got the opposite results on my mac: 202 ± 4.7 - Chrome 184 ± 5.0 - Firefox 171 ± 2.6 - Safari
  • throwaway4PP 3y ago
    fyi, if you're uncertain in the single-digits place, you have no precision in the tenths place. for experimental uncertainty, it's always one sigfig
• fauigerzigerk 3y ago
  I'm getting 457 - Chrome 444 - Safari 348 - Firefox M1 Mac