3 ms·
You could have asked the same question when Google started building their index. Or OpenAI trained their models. I'm in Germany. I'm a licensed lawyer. I see t
by leobg 3y ago
You could have asked the same question when Google started building their index. Or OpenAI trained their models.
I'm in Germany. I'm a licensed lawyer. I see the dangers.
The safest path will be to simply offer the production of multi language translations to content owners themselves. Which is also going to be more efficient - translating the thing at the source, rather than having consumers each create their own translation.
But the original intent for this has been to have my computer translate a video I want to watch with my kids in my private home. Technically, it's not "my computer" in the sense of being just the device that's physically in my home. There's stuff that happens in the cloud. Technically, copies are being made. So one could argue the point.
For most people today, getting your content seen and consumed is the highest you can achieve. To sue someone from another country who cares enough to pay someone else to translate it for him would seem bonkers. But I'm sure there are lawyers who are desperate for work. Who cannot code, and can't be bothered to learn, but still want to do something "in AI". I'll at least give them a hard time. And dare they use ChatGPT hallucinated references on me! :)
- crtasm 3y agoI was more thinking Youtube and record labels might take issue with the service, e.g. how they go after stream ripping sites. Having the creator put a code in their channel description to verify ownership could be a good approach. Thanks for sharing the project!