3 ms·
You don’t have to commit to Google OR ChatGPT. I use ChatGPT for questions with some relatively long wording and also for queries that I know will have tons of
by soneca 3y ago
You don’t have to commit to Google OR ChatGPT.
I use ChatGPT for questions with some relatively long wording and also for queries that I know will have tons of ads and SEO-spam.
An example: yesterday I tried searching for board games that are cooperative and best played by two people. Google showed a lot of ads, very old outdated blog and forum posts. I had to navigate for some time to gather a list of games. A lot of open tabs, a lot of scrolling, a lot of ad closing.
I asked the same question on ChatGPT and it immediately gave me a clean list. With a few different good games that wasn’t in my Google-based list.
Then I went to BGG to check the games, as you can’t trust ChatGPT that much, but you also can’t trust that much listicles from Google.
Using both worked better than committing to one or another. Still, in this case (and many others) I think exploratory search on ChatGPt is better than Google. As I check the results later on a site (not Google) that has authority on it
- cykros 3y agoYou may want to look at using the Brave search engine -- it automatically has the "Brave Summarizer" result at the top of searches, which is powered by its LLM, so you don't necessarily have to decide on one or the other, but get both all in one streamline process. I don't make much explicit use of AI either, but I have found that it does help being built right into my searches, as when it's just basic information I'm looking for, that summary saves me the time of clicking through results.
- Natfan 3y agoKagi has a similar "quick answer"[0] [0]: https://help.kagi.com/kagi/ai/quick-answer.html https://help.kagi.com/kagi/ai/quick-answer.html