3 ms·

So you think the odds are against it? I think that seems like a strong take, but I'm not an expert in the field. In as much as I can see why "no significant in

So you think the odds are against it? I think that seems like a strong take, but I'm not an expert in the field. In as much as I can see why "no significant intelligence" is the null hypothesis, I'd still be inclined to word doubts more cautiously. There is a difference between "we don't have strong enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis" and "I think the null hypothesis is more probable."

xetplan 3y ago
Even if they were in the ball park intelligence wise, humans are absolutely ruthless animals. Personally, I don't think there is all that much mystery what happened. Animals seem to have this habit of vanishing when humans move in.