3 ms·
This is a spin on the old debate of "guns kill people vs. people kill people". Both can be right, which is why effective regulation is necessary. No such limit
by rchaud 3y ago
This is a spin on the old debate of "guns kill people vs. people kill people". Both can be right, which is why effective regulation is necessary.
No such limits seem to apply to ChatGPT style word vomit generators, so the open web may literally turn into a no-man's land(fill).
The way to combat this is to zero in on small communities instead of large ones that attract spammers.
- Trusted blogrolls, webrings, OPML feeds
- Discourse-style messageboards over bot-ridden Discords.
- Smart filters on search engines that filter out blogspam sites (e.g. block if they contain social media "share" buttons).
- Return of apps like StumbleUpon for human curated websites instead of Pinterest-style sites that obfuscate original content and tries to add a "BUY ITEMS IN THIS IMAGE" overlay to every post.
- squigz 3y ago> Discourse-style messageboards over bot-ridden Discords. I'm a bit confused about this comparison. Is there something about Discourse that makes it immune to bots, where Discord is not? (There's a bit of humor in that Discourse has social media "Share" buttons, which are apparently evil)
- pacmanincarnate 3y ago[dead]
- toss1 3y agoYup. This is going to fuel the return of the original Yahoo!-style human-curated internet search engine. Aside from Google already being polluted to uselessness beyond redemption, the firehose of AI trash just makes it impossible, unless they are both motivated and able to get Gemini to discern between real content and trash (both unlikely). Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose . . .