The article "explains" why EVs are better than trains. When you are going to spin something, do the job properly. Ideally, journos don't look like prats, regu

The article "explains" why EVs are better than trains. When you are going to spin something, do the job properly. Ideally, journos don't look like prats, regurgitating the usual nonsense. Headline: EVs produce twice as much CO2 as trains. It all comes down to definitions. Do we include the cost of rail/road construction? That's rather complicated. My EV ... ... oh who gives a shit. Lazy journalism, lazy readership, lazy pin on HN, lazy readership. Rince, repeat.