3 ms·
In the case of malls, it probably comes down to how "open" they are. To your case, imagine a mall that takes half of the city center, is an integral part of ev
by makeitdouble 3y ago
In the case of malls, it probably comes down to how "open" they are.
To your case, imagine a mall that takes half of the city center, is an integral part of everyone's life and was permitted on the ground that it would be a true "third place" for the residents to hang out, which is why it includes structures and areas dedicated to community events and such.
That kind of mall can't be ran like a pure private business that has no accountability outside of its shareholders. There's a balance to strike of course, but if the hooligans have most residents' support, allowing them in would be a decent choice.
- int_19h 3y agoThe obvious problem, then, is that the mall takes half of the city center and is an integral part of everyone's life. There should be no private actors like that. It creates numerous problems, of which the one under review here is not even the most egregious example.