3 ms·
And if Nintendo spends $10 million dollars? And Yuzu spends $25,000 and maybe wins the first case but runs out of money during the appeal and defaults judgment
by theultdev 3y ago
And if Nintendo spends $10 million dollars?
And Yuzu spends $25,000 and maybe wins the first case but runs out of money during the appeal and defaults judgment.
Nintendo gets the pot because they won right?
As I pointed out to another user, this reverses the damage if they win, but does not solve the problem of preventing them from being able to win.
Now if you make it where if you want to spend $5 on lawyer fees, you have to loan $5 to the other side and if the other side wins they don't have to pay it back, that may work.
- rcxdude 3y agoI think the proposal is not "each side contributes to a pot and the winner takes it", it's "if one side wants to spend 10mil on a case and the other side puts in 25k, then each side has 5mil and 12.5k to spend on legal fees"
- theultdev 3y agoAh okay, if that's the case then yeah totally in support for that. That's essentially what I was suggesting with having to loan the opposing team the same amount of money you spend.
- kelseyfrog 3y agoThank you. Correct, there is not "pot" where the winner takes all. The fund is simply and always split 50/50 towards lawyers and fees.