4 ms·
If you can get from A to B faster than a photon in a vacuum could, I'm counting it as FTL. They've been really inconsistent about it. For a while, communicati
by at_a_remove 3y ago
If you can get from A to B faster than a photon in a vacuum could, I'm counting it as FTL.
They've been really inconsistent about it. For a while, communicating through subspace was not quite as long as travel, but it was still a non-zero amount of time. Now, communication seems to be via ansible, and the less said about the wildly varying rates of travel, the better.
- Izkata 3y agoSeveral episodes mention subspace relay stations, and between how communication seems to jump between real-time and waiting hours or more for a reply (I don't recall any minutes-long delays), I have a suspicion the unwritten rule is subspace communication has some sort of speed decay. Like it actually slows down the further it has to go, instead of going at the same speed but weaker, and subspace relay stations intercept the message and re-send it at top speed. More advanced technology in the later-set series could also then just send it faster than in the prequel series, explaining how they communicate over larger distances even though it's supposed to both be subspace communication.
- smogcutter 3y agoI think the unwritten rule is that subspace communication takes precisely as long as the plot requires it to. (Especially in the more modern series)
- hef19898 3y agoStar Trek is an extreme case of the plot driving the tech, and not the other way round. They manage to pull it off, most of the time, using ingenious Starfleet engineering and technobabble. For some reason, with Star Trek it works most of the time.
- SenHeng 3y agoAnd yet, we have something like the Picard Manoeuvre that uses FTL to make it look like you have 2 or more ships in a single location. So they acknowledge that FTL is reality breaking, then just hand wave it away.