3 ms·
We should maybe remember that he is still in his full mental capacity and keeps improving things from the drivers seat. Look at what he’s done after the first l
by neverrroot 3y ago
We should maybe remember that he is still in his full mental capacity and keeps improving things from the drivers seat. Look at what he’s done after the first launch.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 3y ago> Look at what he’s done after the first launch. Blew up the second launch?
- neverrroot 3y agoThat is correct, but there is much more success than failure if you look into it unbiased, they delivered all commit tasks and then some stretch ones too. Based on your response I won’t go any deeper, it would be time wasting, you appear to have made up your mind already.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 3y agoHow many launches did SLS need?
- neverrroot 3y agoHow many successful launches do they have in total? How many did they have 5 years ago? Elon delivered when nobody did, now it’s quite a bit easier.
- runeofdoom 3y agoOne in over a decade, for $23 billion. (And it's arguablely a failure, as the Senate is still earthbound, and likely to remain so for the forseeable future.;))
- panick21_ 3y agoSuch a ridiculous comparison. SLS started 5 years earlier and had 10-20x the budget, and it uses mostly legacy components. SLS uses existing mature engines. Existing production facilities. And so on. If SpaceX had ask themselves, can we make a Super-Heavy of SLS class and launch it the first time, SpaceX could have almost certainty have done that. But that not the goal or the ambition of the project.
- kspacewalk2 3y ago>remember that he is still in his full mental capacity I have serious doubts.