3 ms·
Now everyone's diving straight into the "full AGI by 2025" hole. Which, to be fair, would solve the "full self-driving" problem as a pure side-effect, I guess.
by pton_xd 3y ago
Now everyone's diving straight into the "full AGI by 2025" hole. Which, to be fair, would solve the "full self-driving" problem as a pure side-effect, I guess.
- consumer451 3y agoI believe Musk once admitted on camera that ~"full self driving basically requires AGI." If anyone could help me identify that video, I would appreciate it.
- starbugs 3y ago> I believe Musk once admitted on camera that ~"full self driving basically requires AGI." If anyone could help me identify that video, I would appreciate it. You mean this one? He actually says self driving and LLMs are both headed towards AGI there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEm81F3vjy0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEm81F3vjy0
- ukuina 3y agoLow-latency multi-modal LLMs with constrained outputs can outperform most specialized prev-gen networks, so this may actually work out independent of achieving AGI!