4 ms·
It's insane how many companies went down the "full self driving by 2020" rabbit hole.
by zyang 3y ago
It's insane how many companies went down the "full self driving by 2020" rabbit hole.
- jeron 3y agoI think it makes sense if consider the fact it “solves an actual problem”, would have a massive adoption rate and has a massive market, and the potential value of developing a product like that is easily in the 100 Billions if not Trillions
- pton_xd 3y agoNow everyone's diving straight into the "full AGI by 2025" hole. Which, to be fair, would solve the "full self-driving" problem as a pure side-effect, I guess.
- consumer451 3y agoI believe Musk once admitted on camera that ~"full self driving basically requires AGI." If anyone could help me identify that video, I would appreciate it.
- starbugs 3y ago> I believe Musk once admitted on camera that ~"full self driving basically requires AGI." If anyone could help me identify that video, I would appreciate it. You mean this one? He actually says self driving and LLMs are both headed towards AGI there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEm81F3vjy0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEm81F3vjy0
- ukuina 3y agoLow-latency multi-modal LLMs with constrained outputs can outperform most specialized prev-gen networks, so this may actually work out independent of achieving AGI!
- postalrat 3y agoIts a deep rabbit hole that led us to the current AI craze and will lead use to AGI in 2025.