5 ms·
Since there is a 1005ms latency for a cache-miss, for the average user the loading times are shorter? (based on your data on hit/miss ratio) I was thinking to
by madarco 14y ago
Since there is a 1005ms latency for a cache-miss, for the average user the loading times are shorter?
(based on your data on hit/miss ratio)
I was thinking to use Cloudfront to lower the latency (not costs) for dynamic resources, because in Italy there isn't an ec2 datacenter, but there is an edge location for Cloudfront.
- zubairov 14y agoHi, No 1005 ms was not a cache miss it was a request to the origin server. Latency was 799 ms. I assume CloudFront will contribute some latency, however in our case (we are using Heroku) our servers were already on Amazon platform, therefore CloudFront --> our server latency should be significantly lower. So CloudFront cache miss latency for the enduser will be not significantly higher than origin server latency for the enduser.
- madarco 14y agoThanks, I've asked because I've read somewhere that an average request for a "Miss from cloudfront" object was ~1 second, and I thought that your data was confirming that value.