4 ms·
> why does what content creators may have believed mean fuck-all in terms of what these cases are arguing? I didn't say it did, I acknowledged that SCOTUS woul
by sanity 3y ago
> why does what content creators may have believed mean fuck-all in terms of what these cases are arguing?
I didn't say it did, I acknowledged that SCOTUS would probably rule against the TX and FL laws. I'm talking about the broader context.
> Nobody would have used Facebook if they thought Facebook would "censor" them?
I think if people knew then what they know now about how these platforms would behave starting around 2015 they would have had a much more difficult time achieving their dominant positions, there would have been far more skepticism.
Of course it's hard to prove a counterfactual but that's my view having been a small part of it.
- hellojesus 3y ago> I think if people knew then what they know now about how these platforms would behave starting around 2015 they would have had a much more difficult time achieving their dominant positions, there would have been far more skepticism. Maybe. The polarization of the country has increased significantly since the covid era. Plus most of this censorship discourse really only occurs at the edges. 99% of my meatspace social network cares about seeing puppy vidoes or whatever Taylor Swift has to say. Exactly zero of them have any expectation that their posts will ever be censored because they don't post anything oppositional. I think that, even with censorship, void a real alternative competitor, the networks would have grown all the same. The only difference is maybe TruthSocial or Rumble would have spun off a few years earlier.