I'm not sure you responded to the right comment, as mine was just clarifying that the previous comment didn't make any of the points that the next comment rebut

I'm not sure you responded to the right comment, as mine was just clarifying that the previous comment didn't make any of the points that the next comment rebutted. Similar to this one. But I'll agree that anything can be considered damaging. Only in so much as it can also be considered environmentally friendly even when it's actually damaging. Cigarettes used to be good for you. The marketing arms of large corporations funded much research that supported that claim. What warrants delay is situationally dependent. We shouldn't make blanket statements about delays. Especially as pertains to policy.