3 ms·
To be honest. That doesn't invalidate their opinion. Both can be true.
by hu3 3y ago
To be honest. That doesn't invalidate their opinion.
Both can be true.
- ninetyninenine 3y agoScala is a bit of a journey in intellectual masturbation. Rust is complicated as a side effect of safety I feel. It's not trying to be smart but it appears that way for safety and zero cost abstractions.
- margorczynski 3y agoDepends. Scala can be used as "Java+" with heavily relying on OOP and side-effects, it isn't like Haskell where FP is the hard default. Rust is actually a very well designed language that takes the best ideas from FP (e.g. error/null handling wtih ADTs) where something like Go is stuck in the 80s without any sensible reason as to why. The borrow checker and everything related to it is another matter but it actually solves the biggest hurdle in using e.g. C or C++ which are memory related bugs without any additional performance costs like with a garbage collector.