3 ms·
What is thoughtful to you is likely not to be thoughtful to somebody else What is generally accepted as thoughtful in one world region, will likely not be cons
by vik0 3y ago
What is thoughtful to you is likely not to be thoughtful to somebody else
What is generally accepted as thoughtful in one world region, will likely not be considered to be generally thoughtful in another world region
Furthermore, the concept of "thoughtfulness" may not exist in some world regions -in fact, it may be a concept in a minority of world regions
Should these thoughtful regulations (whatever they may be) only apply to denizens of a certain region or regions, or everybody in the world?
- mrguyorama 3y agoUh, they should apply to the 350 million Americans that this government represents. What is your point? Iran is free to tell Google to take a hike if Google censors their calls to violence. Germany is free to tell id software to remove the swastikas or hit the road. This isn't hard. Don't pretend it is.
- vik0 3y ago>This isn't hard. Don't pretend it is. Funny. What is a thoughtful regulation that would satisfy 50%+1 (democracy, yay!) of the 350 million Americans that the (or, any) government supposedly represents - or however many foolish enough of those 350 million citizens choose to actively participate in federal-level politics? I'm willing to bet that it would be even harder to find any meaningful majority (50%+1) of citizens who are satisfied with such legislation in the second group I mentioned earlier
- numpad0 3y agoJust build a Gestapo this time with proper controls and oversights. That's weird, but if there are multiple mob groups doing the same, some even foreign, that's a threat to any free nation and their power shall be transferred to rightful governments. dc: not a US person
- paulddraper 3y ago> Just build a Gestapo this time with proper controls and oversights Where Poe's and Godwin's laws intersect.