Yeah, I'd agree it's hacking in that definition of the word, but obviously OpenAI is using it in the boogieman scary evil guy hacking definition of the word. It

Yeah, I'd agree it's hacking in that definition of the word, but obviously OpenAI is using it in the boogieman scary evil guy hacking definition of the word. It is semantics, but to clarify definitions OpenAI, despite sama obviously knowing and using our definition of the word, is not using it in that sense. Otherwise the court document would read "NYT paid someone to creatively create a solution to generating copyrighted text" and would actually be praising NYT for that, instead it reads like they are damning them.