5 ms·
So in this thread we have one person claiming out of nowhere that one attack on underwater infrastructure is definitely a false flag, and you are claiming that
by actualwitch 3y ago
So in this thread we have one person claiming out of nowhere that one attack on underwater infrastructure is definitely a false flag, and you are claiming that another one is definitely not a false flag, all without a shred of evidence. How is this any better than just piping llm outputs directly to comment box? This sort of discussion is worthless.
- zmgsabst 3y agoThis would be claiming that it is a false flag: The US blew up a Russian-German pipeline and then blamed Russia.
- lock-the-spock 3y agoYou should probably put this in quotes as OOP is disseminating russian propaganda.
- spacebanana7 3y agoI find it quite interesting - these discussions show that underwater warfare is much more like cyber warfare than air/land/surface sea. Attribution is genuinely difficult. Conclusive evidence is scarce. And to the extent it exists we're stuck with sources that aren't impartial. Arguments about motives & rationality add some value, but they don't create broad consensus.