9 ms·
> But it's not about who deserves what. It's about how much influence can society safely let a single random primate have. You are severely overrating how much
by edanm 3y ago
> But it's not about who deserves what. It's about how much influence can society safely let a single random primate have.
You are severely overrating how much influence $10m buys you, and very severely underrating how much influence you can have without personally having $10m dollars.
- scotty79 3y ago$10 mln can have a lot of influence locally. And please feel free to have $10 million. Above that it's starting to look like you aren't into it just to secure yourself but rather control and impoverish others. There are various ways of attaining influence. Money is just the easiest and least controlled. Morally and practically. So let's plug the biggest hole first then worry about the rest.
- Brusco_RF 3y ago>feel free to have $10 million Thanks, but you don't get to tell me what I'm allowed to have. This is basic property rights. >control and impoverish others. This is quite plainly the fixed pie fallacy[1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lump_of_labour_fallacy#:~:text=The%20term%20%22fixed%20pie%20fallacy,caused%20by%20zero%2Dsum%20bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lump_of_labour_fallacy#:~:text....
- scotty79 3y agoGrowing pie is same as fixed pie if the growth of inequality exceeds the growth of the pie. And it does. In US for last 50 years. Data shows that.