3 ms·
I think the main reason that they aren't going to focus on cost reduction is that it's not really good enough right now. The people that won't buy it at $3500
by empath-nirvana 3y ago
I think the main reason that they aren't going to focus on cost reduction is that it's not really good enough right now. The people that won't buy it at $3500 won't buy it at $2000, either. Anything north of $1,000, if you're not just selling it to ultra wealthy people who don't care about money, it's got to be a core part of their existence like a phone is, or their job is paying for it. And I don't think the product, as it is, is that. A lot of people wouldn't use it if you gave it to them _for free_.
- spacebanana7 3y agoUnless they can come up with financing options. A lot more people might be willing to pay $150 a month for a new VR headset every couple of years.
- posix_monad 3y agoIf you have a small apartment but enough disposable income to drop $2000 on a TV-set (common situation) I can see it be compelling.
- 65 3y agoCan't watch it with other people though. Still need to strap a heavy headset to your face instead of just clicking a button to turn the TV on. I'd still rather have a TV than Vision Pro.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]