4 ms·
No you're right for sure. Aptible is mentioned a few commends down, and is/was basically the same business (compliance focused hosting for small startups). No
by throwkjkbkljbk 3y ago
No you're right for sure. Aptible is mentioned a few commends down, and is/was basically the same business (compliance focused hosting for small startups). Now Aptible has seemingly pivoted away from that focus and are now trying to compete in the PaaS space. There are a couple of obvious reasons here.
1. You're limiting your TAM to just healthcare startups. Why?
2. After not that long, it doesn't make financial sense for your customers to stick with you. I speak from experience on this one having moved some number of customers off of Aptible in the past. Aptible was charging 10X AWS for a pretty thin wrapper around AWS. At any kind of scale beyond a handful of machines it makes sense to just bite the bullet and hire a devsecops person, who in the end will do more for you.
My advice here is to think bigger. Think about what value the GRC/Security/DevOps teams of bigger orgs are delivering and how you could displace (some) of them.
- selinkocalar 3y agoWe absolutely agree. HIPAA compliance for startups is only the beginning for us. We're rolling out SOC2 soon and then will use these as a foundation to moving upmarket. Our end goal isn't to work with startups to automate compliance - we're using this as a launchpad to going upstream in the GRC space.
- debarshri 3y agoI have an opinion about that too. It is super competitive and very democratised. Last I checked there platforms that would charge just $2500 per year for their GRC platform. That's pretty low in my opinion. As a founder, I'll ask you why not start with the actually value proposition or goal you want to achieve right away. Why are you making your jouney very convoluted?
- selinkocalar 3y agoYou bet. We get an interesting mix offering Heroku-like deployment with Vanta-style compliance preparation. We're not just an annual subscription-based GRC checklist that passively monitors, we're an active tool that enforces security on a technical front and runs checks every time an engineer git pushes. We also don't charge usage-based fees, so no one is charged an additional 10x of their AWS usage cost, which any large organization would with good reason want to churn. It's been an effective entry point into the market for us -- establishing a foundation with companies that need to become compliant for the first time and building out core compliance features is a great stepping stone. Lets you work with additional customers while building out your larger product visions.