4 ms·

I would also be interested in the outcome of these tests. Did you test against other protocols ? I've been meaning to do some tests using the c++ implementatio

I would also be interested in the outcome of these tests. Did you test against other protocols ? I've been meaning to do some tests using the c++ implementations of each used in userver.tech (specifically flatbuffers/protobuffs also unsupported sbe & captnproto) for etl processing "generally" (Again more variables are to be weighed in here for my case but would be interesting to see these things against payload sizes)

commandersaki 3y ago
We were serialising/deserialising a large c++ class that consumes about 100 megabytes of memory. The reason we chose protobuf over capnproto was not performance but because it was already being used in other projects. However I implemented both and didn't really do a deep comparison of performance. Basically protobuf serialisation/deserialisation was a few seconds fast. However, I didn't use capnproto as intended, in that I deserialised from the capnproto objects into an actual object which involved copying; I don't really see using the native format directly all that useful in most applications, but maybe I'm missing the point.