>Bigger farms require more chemicals and more pollution. Yes, including antibiotic resistance. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/to-fight-antimicrobi

>Bigger farms require more chemicals and more pollution. Yes, including antibiotic resistance. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/to-fight-antimicrobial-resistance-start-with-farm-animals/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/to-fight-antimicr... >Small farmers can also raise animals for meat consumption, and they can probably do it on a smaller scale, with less environmental impact and less pollution than ... Absolutely. Here's a good video on the topic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRK4I1bSV5I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRK4I1bSV5I >But big ag got those controls removed in the 1970s, leading to lower prices paid to farmers, forcing them to get bigger to survive, or driving many of them into bankruptcy. And a lot of suicide, sadly. >The problem is not meat production per se, but rather a distortion of the system by powerful large corporations. I'm not sure when the US lost its will to keep large corporations at bay, but it's been hurting us ever since. Ever see a M&A the federal government didn't like?