4 ms·
Ironically I think this is the point. The government deliberately made the law very general so they could cast a broad net and remove all of the bad-think books
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3y ago
Ironically I think this is the point. The government deliberately made the law very general so they could cast a broad net and remove all of the bad-think books through the magic of selected enforcement. The malicious compliance was used to highlight this and the difference between 'protecting the children' and the policing of thoughts and ideas (always the root of censorship).
- AustinDev 3y agoTrust, I don't think limiting books available to people is a good thing. However, I understand the intent of the law even if it was written terribly. I don't think government should dictate sexuality to children. However, in this instance the law is terrible.