3 ms·
Especially as the model weights are literally a huge opaque binary blob. Much more opaque than even assembly code. There is plenty of precedent for what "open s
by HPsquared 3y ago
Especially as the model weights are literally a huge opaque binary blob. Much more opaque than even assembly code. There is plenty of precedent for what "open source" means, and these aren't it.
Edit: not that I mind all that much what they're actually doing, it's just the misuse of the word that bristles.
- zozbot234 3y agoOpen source means "the preferred version for modification" and this fits with model weights since you can fine tune them with your own data. Modifying raw training data would be quite unwieldly and pointless.