4 ms·
I don't understand the title, so I asked ChatGPT to rephrase it: "How Being Right or Left-Handed Affects How We Hold Things"
by BurningFrog 3y ago
I don't understand the title, so I asked ChatGPT to rephrase it:
"How Being Right or Left-Handed Affects How We Hold Things"
- lazide 3y agoSpecifically how we hold young children it seems?
- bookofjoe 3y agoThat's better. But I post this comment knowing that ANY praise of ChatGPT and its ilk here guarantees downvotes. This is NOT a friendly venue for AI. And that's an understatement.
- moate 3y agoCommenting on the propensity of a comment to generate downvotes is also a great way to guarantee downvotes, especially if you're not providing much else to the discourse but a verbal upvote. Discourse on rhetoric.
- bookofjoe 3y agoI'm waiting...
- throw10920 3y agoGP comment also just straight-up violates several parts of the guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- medler 3y agoNot really that close, since the most important thing about the title is that it’s talking about cradling [babies]. This is a good example of how ChatGPT often gives answers that seem plausible but are incorrect.
- codersfocus 3y agoInteresting how study titles might be a good way of determining reading levels.
- etempleton 3y agoI don’t know, that is a tortured title. I got what it is saying, but it is about as unclear as one can be for no good reason other than to try and sound smart and I wouldn’t judge someone’s reading level based on their ability to parse that. I guess you could say that equates to reading level, but I think it equates more with one’s familiarity with reading terrible academic papers. Which, yeah, I guess is a type of reading comprehension, but more of an exposure issue than anything else. The paper itself is actually refreshingly clear and direct.