3 ms·
Did you read the paper? My guess is no. Classic HN, references a paper as if the conclusions are fact and all references are equivalent. This is a paper wher
by refurb 3y ago
Did you read the paper? My guess is no.
Classic HN, references a paper as if the conclusions are fact and all references are equivalent.
This is a paper where the authors did no experiments of their own, just put forth a hypotheses.
The lead author is an “independent scientist”.
Suffice to say I’d be very suspect of the conclusions drawn.
- bigbillheck 3y ago> The lead author is an “independent scientist”. The other one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Seneff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Seneff
- refurb 3y agoOoph… “In 2011, she began publishing controversial papers in low-impact, open access journals on biology and medical topics; the articles have received "heated objections from experts in almost every field she's delved into,"”