4 ms·

Categories are a little mixed up. Huggingface is not an LLM. And it does not only run LLMs.

• firstbabylonian 3y ago
  If you think of Huggingface as a source of 'fundamental models', it makes sense.
• monkeydust 3y ago
  Asking Mistral 8x7b-32768: ** Prompt: Is this classification correct: LLM Providers are { Hugging Face, Open AI, Anthropic }. Think step by step. Be very precise and return with YES or NO only for each Provider in the list. Response: For each provider in the list: Hugging Face: No, Hugging Face is not a large language model provider. They are a technology company that provides a platform for NLP and AI, offering a wide range of pre-trained models, including large language models, through their transformers library. OpenAI: Yes, OpenAI is a large language model provider, as they have developed several large language models, like GPT-2 and GPT-3. Anthropic: Yes, Anthropic is a large language model provider, as they have developed large language models, like Claude. In summary, the classification "LLM Providers are { Hugging Face, Open AI, Anthropic }" is not entirely accurate. A more precise classification would be "NLP organizations/companies { Hugging Face }" and "LLM Providers { OpenAI, Anthropic }". **
  • zaptrem 3y ago
    If the model outputs “yes” or “no” before giving its CoT explanation then the explanation is worthless for improving the final decision.
    • lupire 3y ago
      There are imperfect correlations in both stream directions, but forward is probably more causal, as you say.