>The Turing test was never our standard for sentience, no. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalpost

>The Turing test was never our standard for sentience, no. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts >It tests whether a machine is perceptive and expressive enough to be perceived as intelligent, which is not even close to the same thing as being sentient. The same is true for other humans, we don't know if they're sentient, just that they appear to be, that is, they talk and act like it.