4 ms·
Yes, I get it from a science point of view. But if it makes me happy that I have better results with this technique, and I want to share it with others, who are
by ddalex 3y ago
Yes, I get it from a science point of view. But if it makes me happy that I have better results with this technique, and I want to share it with others, who are you to tell me to stop?
If you don't like it, don't use it.
- tonnydourado 3y agoI don't have a problem with you doing and even sharing whatever cargo culting prompting technique you want to share. My problem starts when you make bold claims like "LLMs can self reflect" and your only evidence is "I asked one and it said yes".
- ddalex 3y agoI see no evidence that they can't self reflect. Certainly they can evaluate the confidence of the next predicted token, and that a form of reflection
- tonnydourado 3y ago> Certainly they can (...) No, that's the problem. You don't have certainty, not in any remotely scientific definition of the word, because you don't have enough data, and the data you do have is crap. Also: > I see no evidence that they can't self reflect I see no evidence that there isn't a magical invisible unicorn in the sky that grants wishes to those who wear unicorn themed underwear, so, it must exist.