3 ms·
Unless I'm missing something extraordinary this is: - lacking any details of technical implementation - full of ads - substantiated only by a single thread o
by wokwokwok 3y ago
Unless I'm missing something extraordinary this is:
- lacking any details of technical implementation
- full of ads
- substantiated only by a single thread on X, which is where this article should link to (much as I dislike X), not to a page full of ads.
$500? 1 day? Cool. I'd love to know more; unfortunately, there is no more to know, because this page is just click bait and arbitrary statements like:
> which uses cameras to position itself, using imagery that doesn’t rely on light to work means this drone can fly anywhere in the world it has imagery for at any time of the day or night.
> The team built this impressive drone during the El Segundo Defense Tech Hackathon hosted by 8VC, Entrepreneur First, and Apollo Defense in collaboration with the. <--- the what?
These are obviously wrong and probably AI generated.
This is spaaaaammmm...
Link to the X thread or get rid of it.
- rebolek 3y agoX threads aren't unfortunately very useful for people who don't have account on X. Linking to the original source is much better. If the original source is only X thread, authors should reconsider their life choices. It's never too late.