> They can't reason about it - they just need to see enough data of people handling books. I'd like to see you reason about something before you've seen any da

> They can't reason about it - they just need to see enough data of people handling books. I'd like to see you reason about something before you've seen any data about it. What a silly argument. LLMs understand the world as presented to them via the training data, and the training data to date has been biased in unnatural ways and so sometimes produces unnatural results. That does not prove they cannot reason, it proves that they cannot reason in a vacuum, and neither can people.