4 ms·
There is a real risk in assuming that prescriptions, rather than access to medications, means a person has a higher quality of life. That is absolutely true fo
by _heimdall 3y ago
There is a real risk in assuming that prescriptions, rather than access to medications, means a person has a higher quality of life.
That is absolutely true for some, but for some of the most common medications the underlying conditions themselves may be avoidable. Being able to get prescription drugs for short term ailments is extremely beneficial, but short of a truly permanent condition I have to assume quality of life would be better if the drug wasn't deemed medically necessary (meaning it actually wasn't needed, not trying to parse medical diagnoses).
- maxerickson 3y agoYou are doing the weird thing where you think you are parsing reality differently and better than other people. No one is arguing that all prescriptions are the best solution to all problems.
- _heimdall 3y ago> No one is arguing that all prescriptions are the best solution to all problems. You may have misread my comment, I wasn't arguing against this at all. I was raising that assuming a majority of Americans being prescribed to at least one pharmaceutical isn't really a sign of a higher quality of life.
- maxerickson 3y agoIt's good in that people have better quality of life. isn't saying that it's good people are on prescriptions, it's getting at the fact that most people taking a prescriptions are doing so because it improves their life. Your comment sort of needs the assumption that the other poster thinks they are the best solution to all problems and directly indicate quality of life (rather than representing an improvement to quality of life for people on them).