3 ms·
The guy isn't very smart doing 10X the normal amount of transactions. He should limit it to 25% more than everyone, so it at least seems believable.
by paulhauggis 14y ago
The guy isn't very smart doing 10X the normal amount of transactions. He should limit it to 25% more than everyone, so it at least seems believable.
- jwwest 14y agoOr even better, have a randomized upper and lower limit.
- pavelkaroukin 14y agoHis purpose - get as much money as possible here. And get it now, 'cos tomorrow it might not work, since someone can come up with same idea or bonus rules will change or something else.
- paulhauggis 14y agoHis naive approach will lead to either him or his entire department getting replaced by a computer.
- robryan 14y agoAnd with any luck he will then earn a heap more from the company to maintain and improve his program.
- redthrowaway 14y agoWhich is a good thing. There's no point in having a bunch of people do manually what can be done automatically with greater efficiency and at less cost. Keynesian economics does not apply to individual organizations.
- getsat 14y agoThe point is that it's not a good thing for him for that scenario to unfold.