I don't know where to start criticizing this article. Robin Hanson is [1]. He has 64 years old, is an economist with degrees in top universities yet he writes:

I don't know where to start criticizing this article. Robin Hanson is [1]. He has 64 years old, is an economist with degrees in top universities yet he writes: "While my stamina and raw speed or intensity of thought is probably declining with age", probably? I can support this error from a random article but not from a polymath and scientist. It continues with simple proofreading errors (I am not an English native speaker!) such as "Furthermore, I better know roughly want to expect re what sorts of connections won’t yet have been found, which are how valuable, and what it would take to test them or get folks to listen about them". Then, his core assumption that "... polymaths peak later in life might be a bit discouraging news to young polymaths". Are polymath a homogeneus group? Has he done his research? Just going to the Wikipedia page about polymaths [2] falsifies his claim. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hanson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hanson [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymath https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymath