3 ms·
"globalist" is frequently (typically?) a dog whistle (especially alongside the word "cabal"), it's worth eliminating from your vocabulary if you want to be take
by BobaFloutist 3y ago
"globalist" is frequently (typically?) a dog whistle (especially alongside the word "cabal"), it's worth eliminating from your vocabulary if you want to be taken seriously by people who recognize it, and I feel like your claim wouldn't meaningfully suffer from its lack.
- pphysch 3y agoWhat word do you prefer to describe the class of powerful people who aren't particularly loyal to any nation yet have extensive financial interests in (exploiting) them?
- whimsicalism 3y agocosmopolitan
- lupire 3y agoNormal humans?
- BobaFloutist 3y agoI don't really feel the need to specify which powerful people that have extensive financial interests in exploiting nations are or are not particularly loyal to one nation in particular, but I guess you could go with "rootless cosmopolitan elites", "smirking merchants", or even just "The Illuminati". If you're referring to a specific, discrete group of people, you could just name them instead of using a laundry list of questionable adjectives. But that wouldn't imply a global cabal, and so you couldn't oh so subtly and inconspicuously point fingers at an ethnic and religious minority.