> I'm going off the assumption that you're an average-ish suburban american, so if you're not that, then this doesn't count... Well, I am not. That is not an "

> I'm going off the assumption that you're an average-ish suburban american, so if you're not that, then this doesn't count... Well, I am not. That is not an "average" person at all, how many people in the world would that be, 5%? > Cars use fossil fuels to run, and rare metals to be manufactured. These are inherently limited, thereby making our lifestyle unsustainable already Ok, so we need to step-up recycling and run EVs or CO2-neutral fuels. That's not that far. > Phones, computers, tablets, etc. etc. use rare metals in production, and last a relatively short period (5 years if you're lucky, at least ime). Also unsustainable. I believe we're already pretty good at recycling these? It's also not that large amount, maybe 10 phones and 10 computers per person per lifetime? > A lot of electricity is generated using fossil fuels. That's not a lifestyle problem, more of technological problem. It all sounds like a matter of progressing further and expanding on what we're already doing. I imagine the sub-urban lifestyle would be something that needs to change, but it's such a corner case that in the global scale it won't matter that much.