Your argument is good but is also half-baked. Sure, there's plenty of inequality and bad[1] resource allocation throughout the planet. >The concept that we’re

Your argument is good but is also half-baked. Sure, there's plenty of inequality and bad[1] resource allocation throughout the planet. >The concept that we’re resource constrained to the extent that we’re beyond the carrying capacity of the world is beyond ridiculous We definitely are beyond the carrying capacity of the world, if we want to guarantee a high standard of life for everybody here. 99.9999% of humans will lack the chance of being able to experience the upcoming eclipse from a plane, would you argue that's an unfair scenario? >Don’t complain about the state of the world unless you’re actively fixing it. I absolutely like this comment because that's the way I also go through life, since if one doesn't practice what they preach, one would be just another meek hypocrite, of which we already have an overpopulation of. I can presume, then, that you are doing your part to solve the "greed, fear and distribution" problem you mention, by lowering the amount of resources you consume to one that is typical of what the vast majority of the planet lives on? Nobody needs drones and a robot pet when there’s still politically unstable regions of the world that could use the energy and care that went into creating such luxuries. [2] 1: "Bad", as defined by which standards tho? 2: https://twitter.com/AndrewKemendo/status/1757845715445752201 https://twitter.com/AndrewKemendo/status/1757845715445752201