3 ms·
I've read the books and looked at some Verilog implementations and just see a bit different ISA, not actually better than other ISAs I know (including ARM). So
by Rochus 3y ago
I've read the books and looked at some Verilog implementations and just see a bit different ISA, not actually better than other ISAs I know (including ARM). So I still assume that its major advantage is that it is free. But this is a little advantage compared to all it is necessary to issue a CPU. And the referenced board offers very nice features for a very low price, which would likely be much higher with a comparable RISC-V SoC. So the question remains.
- sylware 3y agoYou missed the elephant in the room...
- Rochus 3y agoThen enlighten us.
- sylware 3y agoBe my guest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V
- Rochus 3y agoWell, you had your chance. Quoting WP is a cheap excuse. I assume you just like the idea of RISC-V without actually knowing it or its competitors. In any case the referenced board does well with the RK3399 (even if it's not the most recent model) and there would be no real advantage in replacing it by a RISC-V-compatible model.
- sylware 3y agoStill missing the pink elephant in the room, the top difference between risc-v and arm... Really chatgpt and clones are really bad at that, and with the size of their context window those trolls can be really long.