4 ms·
I think the idea is that there will be a more diverse group of wealthy people to dominate the new cities, as opposed to just a few wealthy families. Quite a ne
by gee_totes 14y ago
I think the idea is that there will be a more diverse group of wealthy people to dominate the new cities, as opposed to just a few wealthy families.
Quite a neo-conservative (or is it neo-liberal) idea: More freedom through more rich people dominating the under classes!
Of course, some would claim that the writer of this article is just a shrill for the 1%[0]
[0] http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/05/adam-davidson-parrots-disinformation-as-he-extols-rule-by-the-top-0-1.html http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/05/adam-davidson-parrots...
- viggity 14y agoI hate to be pedantic here, but I think you mean "shill" instead of "shrill". Technically what you did there is called a malapropism, where two similar sounding words are misused because the alternative wording could make sense as well. I always thought the saying was "for all intensive purposes", but the actual saying is "for all intents and purposes".