3 ms·
How does this compare with RocksDB? Also, are there any performance benchmarks?
by avinassh 3y ago
How does this compare with RocksDB?
Also, are there any performance benchmarks?
- emills 3y agoThere’s a paper that does some benchmarking against other options here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2018/03/faster-sigmod18.pdf https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2018/0...
- welder 3y agoLooks like it's exponentially faster than RocksDB, but in most use cases the bottleneck would be the network and available sockets on the machine running FASTER. Unless you're doing high throughput embedded data ingestion. Maybe Neuralink could use this.
- ww520 3y agoRocksDB supports point query and range query. This only supports point query. Also I'm not sure whether FASTER supports transaction, as the paper didn't mention it.
- yencabulator 3y agoMy notes from 2018 say FASTER has no multi-key transactions.