The point of a cover for me is to see someone else sing the same song. >If it's just a note-for-note redo of the original, why bother? People's individual voi

The point of a cover for me is to see someone else sing the same song. >If it's just a note-for-note redo of the original, why bother? People's individual voices are different. It's not like a synthesizer where every note sounds the exact same. >Do you think Johnny Cashs's version of "Hurt" would've been better if he tried to sound like Nine Inch Nails? From a quick look it seems like the main difference is that John doesn't mumble as much. I think it's fine to clearly enunciate the words of a song. I don't think that changes the song.