3 ms·
> Your analogy leaves out the fact that RSS doesn't work for serving ads, which is why all of this was in Google's interest. I'm skeptical. There were/are ple
by nordsieck 3y ago
> Your analogy leaves out the fact that RSS doesn't work for serving ads, which is why all of this was in Google's interest.
I'm skeptical.
There were/are plenty of people who did title-only feeds because they wanted to serve ads.
- bamboozled 3y agoThat’s different to Google serving ads
- nordsieck 3y ago> That’s different to Google serving ads A title-only RSS feed means people have to go to their site to consume the content. Which, presumably, has google ads on it.