Yes it is grammatically correct, but it is linguistically and aesthetically an attack on my delicate sensibilities. To me it sounds less like “James is” and mor

Yes it is grammatically correct, but it is linguistically and aesthetically an attack on my delicate sensibilities. To me it sounds less like “James is” and more like “jameses is”. A framework is one individual thing, naming it after a plural noun is a weird juxtaposition. Like naming a kid “jameses”, or a dog “rovers”. Plus “shoe” would be an AWESOME name for a framework! Missed opportunity…