4 ms·
NTIA Solicits Comments on Open-Weight AI Models
- Reubend 3y agoHow do I submit my comment to them?
- bradhilton 3y agoHere is the link. Just push the "Comment" button. https://www.regulations.gov/document/NTIA-2023-0009-0001 https://www.regulations.gov/document/NTIA-2023-0009-0001
- bradhilton 3y agoI just emailed their public affairs office to get the details.
- convexstrictly 3y agoSome information here. https://www.ntia.gov/federal-register-notice/2024/dual-use-foundation-artificial-intelligence-models-widely-available# https://www.ntia.gov/federal-register-notice/2024/dual-use-f...
- Kerbonut 3y agoThe regulations.gov website’s search is terrible. Can someone link to the actual docket where we can add comments?
- snowycat 3y agoThe docket isn't available yet. The URL of the docket should be https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NTIA%E2%80%932023%E2%80%930009 https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NTIA%E2%80%932023%E2%80%9... once it comes out, however. The NTIA website says "Link to the Request for Comment is below. This will be updated with a link to the Federal Register once formally published, along with the final due date, which will be 30 days after formal publication and any other changes made in the final published version."
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- fragmede 3y agoAt least they're calling it Open-Weight. I like the term Model-Available. Definitely not Open Source though.
- convexstrictly 3y agoThe comments will inform the drafting of regulations on open weight models under the Biden executive order on AI using his powers under the Defense Production Act. Fact Sheet: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/30/fact-sheet-president-biden-issues-executive-order-on-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases... Full Details: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-action...
- jph00 3y agoPlease folks, do take the time to submit a carefully written comment to this, because if legislation is introduced to limit or ban open models, then it's going to cause huge pain for society at large -- possibly as far as undoing the very principles of the Enlightenment. And don't think it couldn't happen; there's a reason that these comments are being sought, which is that regulations of open models are being seriously considered. I spent months researching and writing an analysis of AI regulation that covered open models in some detail, so please read this if you're interested in learning more: https://www.fast.ai/posts/2023-11-07-dislightenment.html https://www.fast.ai/posts/2023-11-07-dislightenment.html
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- convexstrictly 3y agoJeremy makes compelling arguments. Here are some more mundane corollaries: It is only a matter of time before you and your company are affected by the pending regulations. In the future, almost all software products will be using AI models, in the same way that most software products use the Internet today, whereas they did not in the 1990s. Imagine you had to license Oracle software because MySQL or PostgresSQL could not offer certain capabilities, or are less capable because of regulation. Now also imagine that your products have to agree with the political world view of either Sundar Pichai or Elon Musk. And if you need capabilities only present in one of the commercial alternatives, you don't even that that choice.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- RcouF1uZ4gsC 3y agoAlso once this door opens, maybe they start regulating the hardware since it is easier than the software. Maybe all ML training and inference hardware can only be sold to “certified” vendors (for safety’s sake, of course). After all, since you can rely on the cloud, why would any one need on-premise, potentially dangerous ML inference.