5 ms·
I think the “Mars” books (red mars, blue mars, green mars) proposed an interesting economic idea. In a world where automation and AI allowed physical stuff to
by seer 3y ago
I think the “Mars” books (red mars, blue mars, green mars) proposed an interesting economic idea.
In a world where automation and AI allowed physical stuff to be organized and built almost as easy as software, you didn’t really _need_ huge organizations (employee wise) to accomplish goals, so Mars came up with an economic setup that did not allow you to join an organization, unless you got hard equity in it, and the amount of equity you could have had a minimum of 1%.
So everyone worked for their own organizations and were incentivized for their success, and organizations couldn’t grow too big (100 people at most).
So you had lots of small organizations with well developed interfaces between them, because there were so many of them. And you could still acquire huge wealth, just couldn’t be a monopoly.
I mean its just sci-fi thought experiment, but it got me thinking maybe there are better economic systems out there, both equitable and free market based …
- manoDev 3y ago> came up with an economic setup that did not allow you to join an organization, unless you got hard equity in it, and the amount of equity you could have had a minimum of 1%. Wow… we’re so deep into capitalism that worker cooperatives is a sci-fi concept now.
- seer 3y agoI think what the author was trying to explore is a society where _all_ the workers are forced to be in cooperatives, I guess kinda like Sweden with its mandated unions, but even more sharply defined. And what the downstream effects of it would be.