> whenever you have a strong and weak entity interacting, you can always find a way to frame anything the stronger entity does as "violence". Correct. While it

> whenever you have a strong and weak entity interacting, you can always find a way to frame anything the stronger entity does as "violence". Correct. While it's a bit crude term than the historical "inquitable", it accurately describes trade surpluses being lost to the weaker party compared to a more equal exchange. This is why BATNA is an important principle.